ojs2 has produced an error Message: WARNING: mkdir(): Permission denied In file: /var/www/html/ojs246_old/lib/pkp/classes/file/FileManager.inc.php At line: 306 Stacktrace: Server info: OS: Linux PHP Version: 5.6.33-0+deb8u1 Apache Version: Apache/2.4.10 (Debian) DB Driver: mysql DB server version: 5.7.27
ojs2 has produced an error Message: WARNING: assert(): Assertion failed In file: /var/www/html/ojs246_old/plugins/generic/usageStats/UsageStatsPlugin.inc.php At line: 308 Stacktrace: Server info: OS: Linux PHP Version: 5.6.33-0+deb8u1 Apache Version: Apache/2.4.10 (Debian) DB Driver: mysql DB server version: 5.7.27
Goodness of Fit Test Based on Modified Log-Likelihood Ratio for Normal Distribution | Songthamboworn | งดใช้ระบบ 3-31 กค 66 Burapha Science Journal

Goodness of Fit Test Based on Modified Log-Likelihood Ratio for Normal Distribution

Tanutsak Songthamboworn, Jutaporn Neamvonk

Abstract


This research presents a goodness of fit test based on modified log-likelihood ratio for normal distribution and compares the efficiency of the proposed test with modified Anderson-Darling test and modified Cramer-von-Mises test which were developed by Zhang (2002), and the original Anderson-Darling tests. The critical values of the tests are obtained through simulation and the efficiency of test is considered as probability of type I error and power of the tests. There are four types of distribution; near normal distribution, symmetric distribution, asymmetric distribution with more than three of kurtosis, and asymmetric distribution with less than three of kurtosisThe results show that the four tests can control type I error probability and the proposed test is the most powerful test for near normal and symmetric distributions with all sizes of sample. The modified Anderson-Darling test is the most powerful test for asymmetric distribution both more than three and less than three of kurtosis with all sizes of sample.                       

Keywords :  goodness of fit test statistic, modified likelihood ratio , power of the test

                      


Full Text:

PDF

References


Anderson, T. W., & Darling, D. A. (1954). A test of goodness of fit. Journal of the American Statistical Association,

(268), 765-769.

Cochran, W. G. (1952). The X2 test of goodness of fit. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 23, 315-345.

Cressie, N., & Read, R.C.T. (1984). Multinomial goodness-of-fit tests. The Journal of the Royal Statistical

Society. Series B (Methodological), 46(3), 440-464.

Pinthongpan, A. & Thongteeraparp, A. (2015). Comparison of the Goodness of Fit Tests for Normality.

Academic Journal Pranakorn Rajabhat University, 6(1), 240-249. (in Thai)

Potas, N., Sarısoy, E.E. & Kara, M. (2014). A modified goodness-of-fit test based on likelihood ratiofor the skew-

normal distribution. Applied Mathematical Sciences, 8, 3869 – 3887.

Razali, N. M., & Wah, Y. B. (2011). Power comparisons of Shapiro-Wilk, Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Lilliefors and

Anderson–Darling tests. Journal of Statistical Modeling and Analytics, 2(1), 21-33.

Rinnakorn, C., & Kamon, B. (2007). A Power Comparison of Goodness-of-fit Tests for Normality Based on the

Likelihood Ratio and the Non-likelihood Ratio. Thailand Statistician, 5, 57-68.

Saethow, P. & Neamvonk, J. (2014). Modified Anderson-Darling test based on the likelihood ratio for skewed

distributions. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Applied Statistics 2014, (pp. 27-34),

KhonKaen, Thailand.

Wasinra, S. (2006). Comparison of the test for Normality using goodness of fit test based on the likelihood ratio.

Master thesis in Statistics, Kasetsart University. (in Thai)

Wichitchan, S. (2010). Effects of statistical analysis under normal distribution assumption on data from logistic

distribution. Master thesis in Statistics, Chulalongkorn University. (in Thai)

Yap, B. W. & Sim, C. H. (2011). Comparisons of various types of normality tests. Journal of Statistical

Computation and Simulation, 81(12), 2141–2155.

Zhang, J. (2002). Powerful goodness-of-fit tests based on the likelihood ratio. Journal of the Royal Statistical

Society. Series B (Methodological), 64(2), 281-294.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.